Details for Dicranota (Paradicranota) robusta
Name:Dicranota (Paradicranota) robusta Lundstrom, 1912
Publication:Acta Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn. 36(1): 66 (as Dicranota)
Status:Recognized taxon, Synonym(s): furva Bergroth, 1922.
Classification:Family Pediciidae
Subfamily Pediciinae
Keys:Stubbs and Kramer, 2016f; Stubbs, 2021 (British craneflies)
Dicranota (Paradicranota) robusta : habitus - maleDicranota (Paradicranota) robusta : hypopygiumDicranota (Paradicranota) robusta : hypopygiumDicranota (Paradicranota) robusta : wingDicranota (Paradicranota) robusta : habitat
habitus
male
hypopygiumhypopygiumwinghabitat
plus 2 more images of habitat and habitat.
Distribution:Croatia, Czech Rep., Denmark, Finland, Germany, Great Britain, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden; Russia: RUW;; Kazakhstan (east).
Note: see the manual for abbreviations: present-day Russia.
Region(s):Westpalaearctic;; Eastpalaearctic
General note:For Finland check Salmela, 2012b, 2012c, and citations below. For Norway check Olsen et al., 2018, and citations below. For Great Britain check Stubbs, 2021, and citations below. To be confirmed for Austria (in Palaearctic Catalogue (Savchenko et al., 1992) and Russia: RUE (Middle Volga region) (in Chuzhekova, 2015, based on larvae only) and Turkey (Asiatic part).
Biology:Hancock, 1991 (biology).
Figure
references:
Habitus: Hancock, 2009b (male)
Citationson biology (mainly from 2000 onward):
Finland
Biology. Salmela, 2008: 12, 29, 40, 53 (49) (ecology or habitat: lotic, associated with swift lowing streams and brooks, citing Tjeder, 1959 and Hancock, 1991; all recent Finnish records are from headwater streams characterized by minerogenous bottom, clear water and slightly alkaline or neutral water quality; conservation value indicator).
Habitat. Penttinen et al., 2010: 485 (red list status incl. criteria, habitats, causes of threat, threat factors).
Habitat. Kramer, 2012f: 3 (from wooded river bank [Kramer pers. comm. july 2012: Dicranota robusta is currently rated as NT in Finland, but that is perhaps because it is under-recorded. They emerge early and lurk low down and are even found under stones at the river margin, and so they are not likely to turn up in a Malaise trap]).
Habitat. Salmela et al., 2019: 521 (red list status, habitat types, threat factors).
Great Britain
Habitat. Godfrey, 1999: 78 (species with strong allegiance to exposed riverine sediments).
Habitat. Hewitt et al., 2005: 52 (species with a strong association with exposed riverine sediment habitats).
Biology. Hancock, 2009b: 3 (a characteristic vernal species of upland fast-flowing streams with low nutrient levels and exposed margins of shingle or small stones, adults usually have shortened and narrow wings which have only a minimal function for flight, some adults may have longer wings but are still reluctant to fly, notes on collecting adults from partly submerged stones).
Habitat. Cranston and Drake, 2010: 175 (Dicranota larvae can be found in marginal situations along flowing waters [except for D. lucidipennis, no species mentioned]).
Habitat. Kramer, 2010a: 2 (usual larval habitat is fast-flowing upland streams with low nutrient levels and a stony/shingle margin, also found in North Somerset at a calcareous nutrient-rich stream at 175 m, so not upland; adults shelter underneath stones at the stream margins).
Habitat. Drake, 2011b: 100 (collected by kick-sampling in a small shaded calcereous stream).
Habitat. Brighton, 2017c: 29, 40 (overall regional checklist Lancashire and Cheshire (VC58, 59 and 60) with notes on habitats and/or regional occurrence and/or status; see paper for details).
Biology. Hancock and Horsfield, 2017: 8 (has reduced wings and are reluctant flyers, usually restricted to skittering across the ground surface when disturbed, citing Hancock, 1991).
Habitat. Hancock and Horsfield, 2017: 8 (inhabitant of exposed upland streams).
Habitat. Hancock, 2018a: 9 (found near Loch Lomond along Endrick Water, notes on association with riverine sediments (ERS) habitats and early date of collecting (april 22)).
on distribution (mainly from 2000 onward):
Croatia
Distribution. Oosterbroek and Simova-Tosic, 2004: 442 (review literature).
Czech Rep.
Distribution. Stary, 2009j: webpage (checklist).
Denmark
Distribution. Petersen et al., 2001: 157 (checklist).
Finland
Distribution. Salmela, 2008: 12, 40, 53 (49) (loc(s), known from 2 of the Finnish ecoregions, apparently absent from the southern part of Finland, review distr).
Distribution. Kramer, 2012f: 3 (loc(s) Obb: Syote National Park).
Distribution. Salmela, 2012b: 242 (annotated list of Finnish crane flies).
Distribution. Salmela and Petrasiunas, 2014: 23 (checklist Finnish Tipulomorpha).
Distribution. Salmela et al., 2019: 521 (red list status, habitat types, threat factors).
France
Distribution not confirmed. Quindroit, 2025a: 95 (removed from the list of French Pediciidae; see paper for details, especially about the record from the Pyrenees in Breil-Moubayed and Garrigue, 2014).
Germany
Distribution. Schacht, 1999: 131, 134 (loc(s), checklist Bayern).
Distribution. Reusch and Bellstedt, 2000: 264 (loc(s) Thuringen).
Distribution. Reusch and Oosterbroek, 2000: 163 (checklist German Bundeslander).
Distribution. Reusch and Bellstedt, 2001b: 76 (checklist Thuringen).
Distribution. Reusch et al., 2004: 119 (loc(s) Brandenburg and Schleswig-Holstein).
Distribution. Schacht, 2005: 4 (checklist Bayern).
Distribution. Schumann, 2008: (species recorded from Brandenburg, including Berlin, based on the literature with specification of period of years).
Distribution. Schacht, 2010: 16 (checklist Diptera Bayern).
Distribution. Stuke, 2019: 163 (checklist Niedersachsen and Bremen with reference to original sources).
Great Britain
Distribution. Hancock, 2009b: 3 (loc(s) Scotland).
Distribution. Kramer, 2010a: 2 (review distr in Great Britain).
Distribution. Drake, 2011b: 100 (loc(s) Somerset).
Distribution. Hewitt, 2014: (provisional checklist Cumbrian Diptera).
Distribution. Brighton, 2017c: 29, 40 (overall regional checklist Lancashire and Cheshire (VC58, 59 and 60) with notes on habitats and/or regional occurrence and/or status; see paper for details).
Distribution. Hancock, 2018a: 9 (found near Loch Lomond along Endrick Water, notes on association with riverine sediments (ERS) habitats and early date of collecting (april 22)).
Kazakhstan
First record. Devyatkov, 2021d: 336 (loc(s) East Kazakhstan, distr, first record for Eastpalaearctic) (in Russian).
Lithuania
Distribution. Pakalniskis et al., 2006: 24 (checklist).
Norway
Distribution. Olsen et al., 2018: 152-153 (annotated checklist Nordic countries and for Norway according to the Strand regions).
Poland
Distribution. Wiedenska, 2007b: 77 (checklist).
Russia
Distribution not confirmed. Chuzhekova, 2015: 212 (on macrozoobenthos communities in spring brooks of Middle Volga) (PhD thesis, in Russian, 242 pages; for English summary see Chuzhekova, 2016, 37 pages).
Slovakia
First record. Stary, 2004e: 322 (loc(s), distr).
Distribution. Stary, 2009j: webpage (checklist).
Slovenia
Distribution. Oosterbroek and Simova-Tosic, 2004: 442 (review literature).
Sweden
Distribution. Cederberg et al., 2010: webpage (red list status Sweden, map, distr).
on flight period (mainly from 2000 onward):
Finland
Kramer, 2012f: month(s): 6.
Germany
Schacht, 1999: month(s): 4.
Reusch and Bellstedt, 2000: month(s): 5, 9.
Reusch et al., 2004: month(s): 4-5.
Great Britain
Hancock, 2009b: month(s): 4.
Kramer, 2010a: month(s): 4.
Drake, 2011b: month(s): 4.
Hancock, 2018a: month(s): 4.
Kazakhstan
Devyatkov, 2021d: month(s): 5.
Slovakia
Stary, 2004e: month(s): 5.
on altitude (mainly from 2000 onward):
Germany
Reusch and Bellstedt, 2000: altitude: 395 m.
Reusch et al., 2004: altitude: about 50 m.
Kazakhstan
Devyatkov, 2021d: altitude: 381-463 m.
Slovakia
Stary, 2004e: altitude: 750 m.

New search

Site developed by Naturalis Biodiversity Center